Yesterday, Robert Kubica was seriously injured during a rally in Italy. Very quickly, a question has emerged: the development of professionalism in F1 does not force does not (unfortunately) the pilot to concentrate solely on the F1? The pilots, if we make a distinction between pilots motivated by passion and by those money, they should put aside what motivates them, their essence to concentrate on F1?
Actually, I can not answer. We appreciate Kubica or not, it was still good to see such drivers have fun competing in other disciplines. Eric Boullier has very well summarized by this statement: "The rally is vital for Robert. It is a balance for him. From there, it's a mutual agreement. We knew the risks. Too. But we did not want to have a robot pilot, a pilot "corporate".
Some take the F1 as a profession, Increasingly, but there are still enthusiasts who like to run, even without necessarily the possibility of a victory. In time, the drivers would run much more disciplines, with much greater risks, and everyone enjoyed this mixed bag of talent that would please. One aspect of Kubica who was not publicized to the death, but that made him more human compared to other drivers.
So, yes, we saw what kind of pilot at a time when there was much more aware of the job, or even the sport altogether. Other times, other customs. The fatality is still there, and risks accidents occur at home as much as in the tracks. The world of F1 is stressful enough so let the drivers live.
Meanwhile he will have to wait a week to learn more about the unavailability of Robert Kubica, even though it seems now accepted that all or part of the 2011 season will be missed by the Polish driver. Waiting to see what decision will Lotus Renault GP.
Finally, a big black spot on some "media" totally web indecent announcing anything and everything. It does not push up viewing figures with the health of drivers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment